Since the days of Charles Darwin, evolutionists have argued that the fossil record supports the concept of macroevolution. However, the creationists have constantly destroyed this alleged argument for naturalism by pointing out the abundant gaps in the fossil record. When it comes to human origins, the case for macroevolution is even worse. There is a lack of evidence that man evolved from a common ancestor with other primates and abundant evidence that humans have not evolved but rather have been supernaturally designed.
Since the days of Charles Darwin, evolutionists have argued that the fossil record supports the concept of macroevolution. However, the creationists have constantly destroyed this alleged argument for naturalism by pointing out the abundant gaps in the fossil record. When it comes to human origins, the case for macroevolution is even worse. There is a lack of evidence that man evolved from a common ancestor with other primates and abundant evidence that humans have not evolved but rather have been supernaturally designed.